Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±³ÇÕÇÏÁßÀÌ Ä¡°æºÎ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ 3Â÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ýÀû ¿¬±¸

Effects of occlusal load on the cervical stress distribution: A three-dimensional finite element study

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2006³â 31±Ç 6È£ p.427 ~ 436
ÀÌÇü¸ð, Ç㺹, ±èÇöö, ¿ì¼º°ü, ±è±¤ÈÆ, ¼Û±Ç, ¹ÚÁ¤±æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÇü¸ð ( Lee Hyeong-Mo ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
Ç㺹 ( Hur Bock ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
±èÇöö ( Kim Hyeon-Cheol ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¿ì¼º°ü ( Woo Sung-Gwan ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ ±â°è¼³°è°øÇаú
±è±¤ÈÆ ( Kim Kwang-Hoon ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ ±â°è¼³°è°øÇаú
¼Û±Ç ( Son Kwon ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ ±â°è¼³°è°øÇаú
¹ÚÁ¤±æ ( Park Jeong-Kil ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº 3Â÷¿øÀ¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒºÐ¼®¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¤»ó »ó¾Ç Á¦2¼Ò±¸Ä¡ÀÇ ÇùÃøºÎÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷¿¡ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ±³ÇÕÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ó¾Ç Á¦2¼Ò±¸Ä¡ÀÇ 3Â÷¿øÀ¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¸ðµ¨À» Çü¼ºÇÑ ÈÄ Çü¼ºµÈ ¸ðµ¨¿¡ 3Á¾·ùÀÇ Á¤ÀûÀÎ 500N Á¡ÇÏÁßÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂÁ¶°ÇÀ» ºÎ¿©ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ANSYS ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ (Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc., Houston, USA)À¸·Î ÃÖ´ëÁÖÀÀ·Â°ú ÃÖ¼ÒÁÖÀÀ·ÂÀ» 4°³ÀÇ ¼öÆò¸é »ó(CEJ »ó¹æ 1 mm, CEJ »ó¹æ 0.5 mm, CEJ, CEJ ÇϹæ 0.5 mm)¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1. peak stress°¡ ÇùÃø ¹é¾Ç¹ý¶û°æ°è¸¦ µû¶ó ºñ´ëĪÀûÀÎ ¸ð½ÀÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2. ¾ÐÃàÀÀ·Â °ªÀº ¹ý¶ûÁúÀÇ ¾ÐÃàÆı«ÀÀ·Â ¹üÀ§ ³»¿¡ ÀÖ¾úÁö¸¸ ÀÎÀåÀÀ·ÂÀº ¹ý¶ûÁúÀÇ ÀÎÀåÆı«ÀÀ·Â ¹üÀ§¸¦ ³Ñ¾î¼¹´Ù. 3. ºñ¿ì½Ä¼ºÄ¡°æºÎº´¼Ò¸¦ ¹ß»ý½ÃÅ°´Â ÁÖ¿äÀÎÀº ¼³Ãø±³µÎÀÇ ÇùÃø°æ»ç¸é¿¡ °¡ÇØÁö´Â ±³Çվп¡ ÀÇÇÑ ÀÎÀåÀÀ·ÂÀ̶ó°í º¸¿©Áø´Ù.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of various occlusal loads on the stress distribution of the buccal cervical region of a normal maxillary second premolar, using a three dimensional fnite element analysis (3D FEA). After 3D FE modeling of maxillary second premolar, a static load of 500N of three load cases was applied. Stress analysis was performed using ANSYS (Swanson Analysis Systems, Inc., Houston, USA). The maximum principal stresses and minimum principal stresses were sampled at thirteen nodal points in the buccal cervical enamel for each four horizontal planes, 1.0 mm above CEJ, 0.5 mm above CEJ, CEJ, 0.5 mm under CEJ. The results were as follows 1. The peak stress was seen at the cervical enamel surface of the mesiobuccal line angle area, asymmetrically. 2. The values of compressive stresses were within the range of the failure stress of enamel. But the values of tensile stresses exceeded the range of the failure stress of enamel. 3. The tensile stresses from the perpendicular load at the buccal incline of palatal cusp may be shown to be the primary etiological factors of the NCCLs.

Å°¿öµå

±³ÇÕÀÀ·Â;ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷;À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒºÐ¼®;»ó¾ÇÁ¦2¼Ò±¸Ä¡;¾ÐÃàÀÀ·Â;ÀÎÀåÀÀ·Â
Occlusal load;Stress distribution;Finite element analysis;Maxillary second premolar;Compressive stress;Tensile stress

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI